Decision on Ground 2
24. Since we are clear there is an error of law in relation to ground 1, it is not necessary for us to reach a concluded view on ground 2. We note the criticisms but do not think that either individually or cumulatively these would amount to an error of law which would justify us overturning the FTT's decision on this ground.
- DECISION AND REASONS
- The Law
- Al-Sirri v Secretary of State for the Home Department
- Pushpanathan v Canada, Minister of Citizenship and Immigration
- Al-Sirri
- R (on the application of JS) (Sri Lanka) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
- Tadic
- KJ (Sri Lanka) v SSHD
- the Evidence
- Upper Tribunal
- Before
- Between
- Appellant
- Representation
- DETERMINATION AND REASONS
- Grounds of Appeal
- Al-Sirri v Secretary of State
- The FTT’s Approach
- Submissions for Secretary of State
- Submissions for the Appellant
- Decision on Ground 1 – Standard of proof
- AH (Algeria) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
- Ground 2
- Youssef v Foreign Secretary
- MN (Somalia) v Secretary of State
- Decision on Ground 2
- Further Procedure
- DIRECTIONS