Ground 2
20. The Secretary of State maintained that there were a number of findings which disclosed a series of errors in the way in which the FTT had analysed the submissions and the evidence relied upon by the Secretary of State. In particular the FTT had recorded that the appellant was never arrested in connection with the alleged planned bombing of the United States Embassy in Albanian. While it was true he had never been prosecuted or convicted, that did not accord with the evidence before the FTT from the Security Service. 21. Secondly, while it was said that the FTT was technically correct to state that it had received no evidence as to the reasons for redactions to the Security Service documents, it had in fact received a full explanation of this point and the court in
- DECISION AND REASONS
- The Law
- Al-Sirri v Secretary of State for the Home Department
- Pushpanathan v Canada, Minister of Citizenship and Immigration
- Al-Sirri
- R (on the application of JS) (Sri Lanka) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
- Tadic
- KJ (Sri Lanka) v SSHD
- the Evidence
- Upper Tribunal
- Before
- Between
- Appellant
- Representation
- DETERMINATION AND REASONS
- Grounds of Appeal
- Al-Sirri v Secretary of State
- The FTT’s Approach
- Submissions for Secretary of State
- Submissions for the Appellant
- Decision on Ground 1 – Standard of proof
- AH (Algeria) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
- Ground 2
- Youssef v Foreign Secretary
- MN (Somalia) v Secretary of State
- Decision on Ground 2
- Further Procedure
- DIRECTIONS