PF (Nigeria
) v
SSHD
[2015] EWCA Civ 251, the Court of Appeal, having emphasised the supreme importance of the tribunal identifying exceptional, or compelling, factors sufficient to outweigh the public interest in deportation, stated at [43]: “ I fully recognise that if the Judge’s factual findings are well founded, they will be a real and damaging impact on his partner and t
he children; but that is a common consequence of the deportation of a person who has children in this country. Deportation will normally be appropriate in cases such as the present, even though the children will be affected and the interests of the children are a primary consideration. ” We are also mindful of the statement of the Court of Appeal in
- Introduction
- istory
- First Decision of the FtT
- First Appeal to the Upper Tribunal
- ost Recent Decision of the FtT
- This Appeal
- Paragraph 398
- Paragraph 399
- Paragraph 399A
- Criminals
- SSHD
- China
- PF (Nigeria
- Somalia
- pproach)
- Rules Issue
- Chege
- Bairstow
- Secretary of State for Work and Pensions
- application
- they
- every
- Greenwood
- (Automatic Deportation: Order of Events)
- an inherent jurisdiction
- Haddad
- Secretary of State for the Home Department
- ) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
- DS (Afghanistan)
- Practice
- Disposal
