Practice
26. Finally, we have drawn attention, in [8] above, to the disconnect between the grant of permission to appeal and the case presented on behalf of the Secretary of State at the hearing. We also received the customary 11 th hour skeleton argument on behalf of the Secretary of State. The timing of its advent compares with that which occurs in relation to Rule 24 Notices in a disturbingly high percentage of cases. We take this opportunity to emphasise, not for the first time, the impropriety of each of these practices and the breach of the Tribunal’s pro cedural rules which they entail .
- Introduction
- istory
- First Decision of the FtT
- First Appeal to the Upper Tribunal
- ost Recent Decision of the FtT
- This Appeal
- Paragraph 398
- Paragraph 399
- Paragraph 399A
- Criminals
- SSHD
- China
- PF (Nigeria
- Somalia
- pproach)
- Rules Issue
- Chege
- Bairstow
- Secretary of State for Work and Pensions
- application
- they
- every
- Greenwood
- (Automatic Deportation: Order of Events)
- an inherent jurisdiction
- Haddad
- Secretary of State for the Home Department
- ) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
- DS (Afghanistan)
- Practice
- Disposal