This Appeal
8. The Secretary of State has been granted permission to appeal against this decision. The essence of the grant of permission is contained in the following passage: “ The decision does not show what it is about the circumstances of the Appellant and the children that make it very compelling or unduly harsh. The situation was predictable as were the consequences for the Appellant and his family. ” There is little correlation between the grant of permission to appeal (on the one hand) and the dominant argument which was presented to us on behalf of the Secretary of State (on the other). We permitted this argument to unfold de bene esse . Its substance is that the FtT erred in law in its consideration of paragraphs 399 and 399A of the Immigration Rules .
- Introduction
- istory
- First Decision of the FtT
- First Appeal to the Upper Tribunal
- ost Recent Decision of the FtT
- This Appeal
- Paragraph 398
- Paragraph 399
- Paragraph 399A
- Criminals
- SSHD
- China
- PF (Nigeria
- Somalia
- pproach)
- Rules Issue
- Chege
- Bairstow
- Secretary of State for Work and Pensions
- application
- they
- every
- Greenwood
- (Automatic Deportation: Order of Events)
- an inherent jurisdiction
- Haddad
- Secretary of State for the Home Department
- ) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
- DS (Afghanistan)
- Practice
- Disposal