Case No. UKUT-00043(IAC)
Upper Tribunal Immigration and Asylum Chamber

Case No. UKUT-00043(IAC)

Fecha: 30-Oct-2019

Case law

57. The two key cases prayed in aid by Mr Lewis in support of his main arguments were the Supreme Court decisions in ZH(Tanzania ) [2011] 2 AC 166 and Zoumbas [2013] UKSC 34. 58. In ZH (Tanzania ) Lady Hale, in analysing the relevance of the best interests of the child as a primary consideration, observed at [30] and [32] that: “30. Although nationality is not a “trump card” it is of particular importance in assessing the best interests of any child. The UNCRC recognises the right of every child to be registered and acquire a nationality (Article 7) and to preserve her identity, including her nationality (Article 8). In Wan , the Federal Court of Australia, pointed out at para 30 that, when considering the possibility of the children accompanying their father to China, the tribunal had not considered any of the following matters, which the Court clearly regarded as important: “(a) the fact that the children, as citizens of Australia, would be deprived of the country of their own and their mother’s citizenship, ‘and of its protection and support, socially, culturally and medically, and in many other ways evoked by, but not confined to, the broad concept of lifestyle’ ( Vaitaiki v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs [1998] FCA 5, (1998) 150 ALR 608, 614); (b) the resultant social and linguistic