A. HISTORY
2.The Upper Tribunal’s order followed its finding that the decision of the First-tier Tribunal in the applicant’s appeal, following a hearing at which the applicant had appeared by video-link from Jamaica, contained an error of law and should be set aside. In essence, the Upper Tribunal concluded that the applicant’s appeal could not be “effective”, as explained by the Supreme Court in
- JUDGMENT
- A. HISTORY
- Kiarie and Byndloss v Secretary of State for the Home Department
- Kiarie and Byndloss
- B. THE SECTION 94B CHALLENGE
- R (QR (Pakistan)) v SSHD
- McCann v United Kingdom
- Kiarie
- CHALLENGE TO THE UPPER TRIBUNAL’S ORDER OF 9 MAY 2019
- Supplementary powers of Upper Tribunal
- SM v Court of Protection
- Pierhead Drinks v HMRC
- BPP Holdings Ltd v Revenue and Customs Commissioners Practice Note
- William Hill Organisation Ltd v Crossrail Ltd
- Gurusinghe
- D. DECISION