Kiarie and Byndloss v Secretary of State for the Home Department
[2017] UKSC 42; [2017] Imm AR 1299, because his presence in the United Kingdom was necessary for the preparation of an assessment and report in respect of his children, J and RN. 3.On 31 March 2018, the Upper Tribunal (Lane J, President; Upper Tribunal Judge O’Connor) had stayed the present judicial review proceedings. At that point, the proceedings challenged not only the respondent’s decision to maintain the section 94B certificate in respect of the applicant but also the respondent’s refusal to facilitate the applicants return from Jamaica. The decision to stay the proceedings is reported as
- JUDGMENT
- A. HISTORY
- Kiarie and Byndloss v Secretary of State for the Home Department
- Kiarie and Byndloss
- B. THE SECTION 94B CHALLENGE
- R (QR (Pakistan)) v SSHD
- McCann v United Kingdom
- Kiarie
- CHALLENGE TO THE UPPER TRIBUNAL’S ORDER OF 9 MAY 2019
- Supplementary powers of Upper Tribunal
- SM v Court of Protection
- Pierhead Drinks v HMRC
- BPP Holdings Ltd v Revenue and Customs Commissioners Practice Note
- William Hill Organisation Ltd v Crossrail Ltd
- Gurusinghe
- D. DECISION
