SM v Court of Protection
[2021] EWHC 2046 (Admin). In that case, the judge held that the Court of Protection was not subject to judicial review as it was the alter ego or avatar of the High Court. By contrast, the Upper Tribunal was not:“The High Court powers granted … by s.25 are essentially procedural. They do not reincarnate the High Court under a different name” (paragraph 12). 52.Also relied on is
- JUDGMENT
- A. HISTORY
- Kiarie and Byndloss v Secretary of State for the Home Department
- Kiarie and Byndloss
- B. THE SECTION 94B CHALLENGE
- R (QR (Pakistan)) v SSHD
- McCann v United Kingdom
- Kiarie
- CHALLENGE TO THE UPPER TRIBUNAL’S ORDER OF 9 MAY 2019
- Supplementary powers of Upper Tribunal
- SM v Court of Protection
- Pierhead Drinks v HMRC
- BPP Holdings Ltd v Revenue and Customs Commissioners Practice Note
- William Hill Organisation Ltd v Crossrail Ltd
- Gurusinghe
- D. DECISION