UT (Tax & Chancery) UT-2024-000010 - [2024] UKUT 00416 (TCC)
Fecha: 05-Nov-2024
Publication of the Decision Notices would reveal irrelevant personal information about the Applicant’s financial circumstances
Publication of the Decision Notices would reveal irrelevant personal information about the Applicant’s financial circumstances
The Applicant’s submissions
Mr Cherry submitted that the Decision Notice relating to the Applicant reveals that she is in parlous financial circumstances insofar it has a reduced penalty on the grounds that she would suffer serious financial hardship if the financial penalty was larger. The proposed financial penalty is assessed as a level 4 seriousness matter in the Decision Notice. This indicates that the Authority considers the findings in its notice to be very serious.
As with the above submissions, that determination is premised on the outcome of the Grant Thornton file review process and the input and calculations of Dr Purdon which is based on that Grant Thornton file review process. For the reasons above this is an unsafe observation to be published in the Applicant’s Decision Notice and one which will not be apparent from a broad observation that the findings in the notice are preliminary and subject to challenge.
- Heading
- Introduction
- The Law
- The Privacy Applications
- Submissions and evidence on behalf of the Applicant
- Adverse Impact on the Applicant’s Mental Health - evidence and submissions
- The Applicant’s written evidence
- [] The Applicant’s counsellor
- Discussion and analysis
- The evidence
- Procedural history relating to the provision of the mental health evidence
- The GP’s letters
- The letters from the Applicant’s counsellor []
- The Applicant’s personal statement
- The fact that some information concerning the subject matter of a reference is already in the public domain is a factor which tends in favour of publication
- The Remaining grounds for the Privacy Applications
- Publication of the Decision Notices would cause reputational destruction to the Applicant
- Discussion and analysis
- Publication of the Decision Notices is not appropriate and there is an absence of urgency or consumer protection imperative
- Discussion and Analysis
- Publication of the Decision Notices would reveal irrelevant personal information about the Applicant’s financial circumstances
- Discussion and Analysis
- Conclusions