Upper Tribunal Tax and Chancery Chamber

UT (Tax & Chancery) UT-2024-000010 - [2024] UKUT 00416 (TCC)

Fecha: 05-Nov-2024

Submissions and evidence on behalf of the Applicant

Submissions and evidence on behalf of the Applicant

10.

Mr Cherry accepted that the impact on the Applicant’s health is the primary ground relied upon in support of the Privacy Applications. Each of the other grounds is related to and intertwined to some degree with this primary ground and provides an illustration of additional factors which he submitted aggravate the principal mental health ground sustaining the Privacy Applications. He further accepted that the other three grounds were not freestanding but supplemented and strengthened the mental health ground.

Heading
Introduction
The Law
The Privacy Applications
Submissions and evidence on behalf of the Applicant
Adverse Impact on the Applicant’s Mental Health - evidence and submissions
The Applicant’s written evidence
[] The Applicant’s counsellor
Discussion and analysis
The evidence
Procedural history relating to the provision of the mental health evidence
The GP’s letters
The letters from the Applicant’s counsellor []
The Applicant’s personal statement
The fact that some information concerning the subject matter of a reference is already in the public domain is a factor which tends in favour of publication
The Remaining grounds for the Privacy Applications
Publication of the Decision Notices would cause reputational destruction to the Applicant
Discussion and analysis
Publication of the Decision Notices is not appropriate and there is an absence of urgency or consumer protection imperative
Discussion and Analysis
Publication of the Decision Notices would reveal irrelevant personal information about the Applicant’s financial circumstances
Discussion and Analysis
Conclusions