UT (Tax & Chancery) UT-2024-000098 - [2025] UKUT 00247 (TCC)
Fecha: 21-May-2025
Heading

UT (Tax & Chancery) Case Number: UT-2024-000098
Hearing venue: The Rolls Building
London EC4A 1NL
Judgment date: 23 July 2025
INCOME TAX –– FTT erred in deciding Respondent was entitled to coronavirus support payments pursuant to the Self-Employment Income Support Scheme “SEISS” – Respondent was not a qualifying person at the relevant time because he was not self-employed but a director or employee of a limited company which was trading - HMRC’s appeal allowed – FTT Decision set aside and remade confirming HMRC’s assessment to recover the payments
Before
JUDGE RUPERT JONES
JUDGE VIMAL TILAKAPALA
Between
THE COMMISSIONERS FOR HIS MAJESTY’S REVENUE AND CUSTOMS
Appellants
And
MARC GUNNARSSON
Respondent
Representation:
For the Appellants: Ms Laura Inglis of counsel instructed by the General Counsel and Solicitor for His Majesty’s Revenue and Customs
The Respondent appeared in person
- Heading
- INTRODUCTION
- THE LAW
- HMRC’s guidance on the eligibility requirement
- Case law
- THE FTT DECISION
- THE PARTIES’ SUBMISSIONS
- The Respondent’s submissions
- Ground 1: The FTT failed to apply the statutory eligibility criteria when evaluating the First and Second Claims and relied instead on a misinterpretation of HMRC’s guidance
- Ground 2: In evaluating the First Claim, the FTT applied an “honest belief” test which does apply to nor form part of the relevant legislation
- RE-MAKING THE DECISION
- Conclusions