UT (Tax & Chancery) UT-2024-000098 - [2025] UKUT 00247 (TCC)
Fecha: 21-May-2025
THE LAW
THE LAW
The Legislation
Sections 71 and 76 of the Coronavirus Act 2020, as originally in force, provided the Treasury with the power to direct HMRC’s functions in relation to the coronavirus pandemic. By this power, the Treasury introduced the First SEISS Direction on 30 April 2020 which provided for the making of support payments to the self-employed. This was followed by the Second SEISS Direction on 1 July 2020 and further SEISS directions during the coronavirus pandemic.
Paragraph 3 of the Schedule to the First SEISS Direction, under which the Respondent’s First Claim was made, sets out certain eligibility requirements for support payments under the SEISS.
In particular, paragraph 3.2 of the Schedule to the First SEISS Direction provides as follows: “A claim must be made by a qualifying person.”
Paragraphs 4.1 and 4.2 of the Schedule then provide as follows:
A person is a qualifying person if the following conditions are met.
The person must-
carry on a trade the business of which has been adversely affected by reason of circumstances arising as a result of coronavirus or coronavirus disease,
have delivered a tax return for a relevant tax year on or before 23 April 2020,
have carried on a trade in the tax years 2018-19 and 2019-20,
intend to continue to carry on a trade in the tax year 2020-21,
if that person is a non-UK resident or has made a claim under section 809B of ITA 2007 (claim for remittance basis to apply), certify that the person’s trading profits are equal to or more than the person’s relevant income for any relevant tax year or years,
be an individual, and
meet the profits condition.
Paragraph 13 of the Schedule also contains the following definition: ‘“trade” means a trade, profession or vocation the profits of which are chargeable to income tax under Part 2 of ITTOIA 2005 (trading income) and in this definition “trade” has the same meaning as in section 989 of ITA 2007.’ Section 989 ITA 2007 in turn provides that ‘“trade” includes any venture in the nature of a trade.’
The Second SEISS Direction, under which the Second Claim was made, extended the SEISS and incorporated the eligibility requirements contained in paragraph 3 of the Schedule to the First SEISS Direction. Paragraph 3 of the Schedule to the Second SEISS Direction provides that “all the provisions of SEISS continue to apply to this extension as they apply in relation to SEISS… unless the context otherwise provides.” Paragraph 10.1 of that same Schedule also specifies that: “A claim for payment under SEISS Extension (a “SEISS Extension payment”) must be made in accordance with paragraph 3 of SEISS on or before 19 October 2020.” Paragraph 12.1 of the Schedule to the Second SEISS Direction then defines “SEISS” by reference to the First SEISS Direction: ‘“SEISS” means the Self-Employment Income Support Scheme set out in the Schedule to the direction given by the Treasury to HMRC on 30 April 2020 in exercise of the powers conferred by sections 71 and 76 of the Coronavirus Act 2020.’
Accordingly, the Second Claim was also subject to the requirements of paragraphs 3.2, 4.1 and 4.2 of the Schedule to the First SEISS Direction set out above.
Paragraph 8 of Schedule 16 to the Finance Act 2020 provides for the full amount of any payments received under the SEISS to which any claimant was not entitled to be recoverable as income tax. Paragraph 9, in so far as relevant, empowers HMRC to recover such income tax by means of an assessment:
9(1) If an officer of Revenue and Customs considers (whether on the basis of information or documents obtained by virtue of the exercise of powers under Schedule 36 to FA 2008 or otherwise) that a person has received an amount of a coronavirus support payment to which the person is not entitled, the officer may make an assessment in the amount which ought in the officer's opinion to be charged under paragraph 8.
An assessment under sub-paragraph (1) may be made at any time, but this is subject to sections 34 and 36 of TMA 1970.
Parts 4 to 6 of TMA 1970 contain other provisions that are relevant to an assessment under sub-paragraph (1) (for example, section 31 makes provision about appeals and section 59B(6) makes provision about the time to pay income tax payable by virtue of an assessment).
…
- Heading
- INTRODUCTION
- THE LAW
- HMRC’s guidance on the eligibility requirement
- Case law
- THE FTT DECISION
- THE PARTIES’ SUBMISSIONS
- The Respondent’s submissions
- Ground 1: The FTT failed to apply the statutory eligibility criteria when evaluating the First and Second Claims and relied instead on a misinterpretation of HMRC’s guidance
- Ground 2: In evaluating the First Claim, the FTT applied an “honest belief” test which does apply to nor form part of the relevant legislation
- RE-MAKING THE DECISION
- Conclusions