Tribunal de Justicia de la Unión Europea

Fecha: 07-Jul-2015

Fecha: 02-Jul-2015

17Mediante demanda presentada en la Secretaría del Tribunal el 15 de abril de 2013, el demandante interpuso el presente recurso. 18Al modificarse la composición de las Salas del Tribunal a partir del nuevo año judicial, el Juez Ponente fue adscrito a la Sala Tercera, a la que se atribuyó en consecuencia el presente asunto. 19A propuesta del Juez Po...

Fecha: 02-Jul-2015

17The applicant brought the present action by application lodged at the Court Registry on 15April 2013. 18Following a change in the composition of the Chambers of the Court at the beginning of the new judicial year, the Judge-Rapporteur was assigned to the Third Chamber, to which this case was therefore allocated. 19On a proposal from the Judge-Rap...

Fecha: 30-Abr-2015

5The applicant claims that the Court should: –annul the contested decision; –order the Commission to pay the costs. 6By statement lodged at the General Court Registry on 17June 2014, the Commission made an application seeking a decision from the General Court that there is no need to adjudicate and seeking costs. 7On 21August 2014 the applicant gav...

Fecha: 03-Sep-2015

8On 22September 2014, Spain brought an action against the contested decision. It claims that the Court should: –annul the contested decision; –order the Commission to pay the costs. 9On 11November 2014, the Commission lodged a plea of inadmissibility under Article114(1) of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court of 2May 1991. It contends that t...

Fecha: 18-Jun-2015

6The Republic of Estonia claims that the Court should: –principally, annul the following provisions of the Directive: –Article4(6), in so far as it makes the option open to Member States to impose on small undertakings accounting information requirements which go beyond those of the Directive subject to the condition that the requirement be ‘contai...

Fecha: 12-Feb-2015

15By decisions of the President of the Court of 14 May, 28 May and 26June 2014, the French Republic, the Commission and the Czech, respectively, were granted leave to intervene in support of the form of order sought by the Council. 16The Parliament claims that the Court should: –annul the contested Directive; and –order the Council to pay the costs...

Fecha: 23-Nov-2015

11Under Article130(1) of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court, on the application of the defendant, the Court may decide on inadmissibility or lack of competence without going to the substance of the case. In the present case, the Court considers it has sufficient information from the documents in the file and has decided to give a decision ...

Fecha: 05-May-2015

19By application lodged at the Registry of the Court on 22March 2013, the Kingdom of Spain brought the present action. 20By decisions of the President of the Court of 12September 2013, the Kingdom of Belgium, the Czech Republic, the Kingdom of Denmark, the Federal Republic of Germany, the French Republic, the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg, Hungary, the...

Fecha: 05-May-2015

17By application lodged at the Court’s Registry on 22March 2013, the Kingdom of Spain brought the present action. 18By decisions of the President of the Court of 12September 2013, the Kingdom of Belgium, the Czech Republic, the Kingdom of Denmark, the Federal Republic of Germany, the French Republic, the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg, Hungary, the King...

Fecha: 12-Nov-2015

15The United Kingdom claims that the Court should: –annul the contested provisions in so far as they extend beyond London what was Corridor No2 in the Annex to Regulation No913/2010, now referred to as the ‘North Sea— Mediterranean’ corridor in Regulation No1316/2013; and –order the European Parliament and the Council of the European Union to pay t...

Fecha: 16-Sep-2015

10By application lodged at the Court Registry on 1August 2014, the applicant brought the present action. 11By separate document lodged at the Court Registry on the same date, the applicant requested that the case be dealt with under the expedited procedure provided for by Article76a of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court of 2May 1991. 12On ...

Fecha: 08-Sep-2015

12The Kingdom of Spain claims that the Court should: –annul Article19 of the Eurosur Regulation; –order the Parliament and the Council to pay the costs. 13The Parliament and the Council contend that the Court should: –dismiss the action as unfounded; –order the Kingdom of Spain to pay the costs. 14By decision of the President of the Court of 19May ...

Fecha: 01-Dic-2015

18On 12September 2012, the Commission submitted a proposal for a Regulation of the Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation No1342/2008 (COM(2012) 498 final), with the aim of improving and clarifying the provisions of the latter regulation. 19That proposal for a regulation was based on Article43(2) TFEU and was intended to resolve certain ...

Fecha: 16-Jul-2015

7The Commission claims that the Court of Justice should: –annul Article1(1) of Regulation No1289/2013, and Article1(4) of that regulation in so far as it inserts a new Article4b in Regulation No539/2001; –declare that the effects of the annulled provisions and any implementing measure derived therefrom are definitive pending their replacement withi...

Fecha: 15-Dic-2015

9Pursuant to European Council Decision 2012/419/EU of 11July 2012 amending the status of Mayotte with regard to the European Union (OJ 2012 L204, p.131), Mayotte ceased, from 1January 2014, to be one of the overseas countries and territories within the meaning of Article355(2) TFEU and became an outermost region within the meaning of Article349 TFE...

Fecha: 18-May-2015

14In support of their action the applicants put forward five pleas in law. As regards the admissibility of their action, their sole submission is that, on the grounds set out in the application in relation to the first plea in law, they are directly and individually concerned by the contested regulation because it infringes the ‘breeders’ exemption...

Fecha: 24-Jun-2015

9For the purposes of these proceedings, the background to the dispute set out in paragraphs1 to 35 of the judgment under appeal may be summarised as follows. 10The Fresh Del Monte Produce group is one of the world’s leading vertically integrated producers, marketers and distributors of fresh and fresh-cut fruit and vegetables, as well as a leading ...

Fecha: 16-Jul-2015

7On 8September 2010 ClientEarth, a company limited by guarantee under English law one of whose objects is protection of the environment, submitted to the Commission’s Directorate General (DG) for the Environment an application for access to documents under Regulation No1049/2001 and Regulation No1367/2006. That application concerned several documen...

Fecha: 16-Jul-2015

6Article8(5) of Regulation (EC) No1107/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21October 2009 concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market and repealing Council Directives 79/117/EEC and 91/414/EEC (OJ 2009 L309, p.1), provides that ‘[s]cientific peer-reviewed open literature, as determined by the [EFSA], on the a...