![AC-2023-LON-002337 - [2025] EWHC 1985 (Admin)](https://backend.juristeca.com/files/emisores/logo_fi51A75.png){kind=logo}
Conclusions
Conclusions
The SDJ was entitled to conclude on the evidence that the Applicant is not at real risk of being detained in contravention of Article 3 ECHR or in contravention of Article 14 ECHR and that it would not be oppressive due to his physical or mental condition to extradite him. The SDJ’s conclusions were not wrong. I refuse permission to appeal.
END
- Heading
- Introduction
- Acronyms and Short Forms
- Factual Background to the alleged Offences and Extradition Request
- The Extradition Proceedings
- The United States Prison System
- The Grounds of Appeal
- The Test on Appeal
- Compatibility with Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR)
- Compatibility with Article 14 ECHR, read in conjunction with Article 3 ECHR
- Real Risk of More Severe Punishment due to Nationality in CAR Prisons under section 81(b) or on the basis of sexual orientation
- Section 91 of the Extradition Act 2003 – Mental Health and Suicide Risk
- Article 3
- Article 14
- More Severe Punishment by reason of Nationality or Sexual Orientation?
- Mental Health and the Suicide Risk
- Conclusions