![AC-2024-LON-001145 - [2025] EWHC 2075 (Admin)](https://backend.juristeca.com/files/emisores/logo_fi51A75.png){kind=logo}
Additional allegations against the second appellant
Additional allegations against the second appellant
The second appellant faced the following additional allegations:
“4. On 26 September 2019 you submitted your annual appraisal form within which you stated that you had ‘nothing to declare’ in relation to ‘suspensions, restrictions on practice or being subject to an investigation of any kind since [your] last appraisal.
5. You knew the declaration referred to at paragraph 4 above to be untrue in that you knew you were under investigation by the General Medical Council.
6. Your actions at paragraph 4 were dishonest by reason of paragraph 5.”
- Heading
- Mrs Justice Farbey DBE
- Anonymity
- Legal framework for appeals
- The EA 2010
- Factual background
- The GMC proceedings: interim stages
- The first set of judicial review proceedings: decision by Eyre J
- The common allegations
- Additional allegations against the first appellant
- Additional allegations against the second appellant
- The course of the proceedings
- The abuse of process decision
- Adjournment
- The second set of judicial review proceedings: decision of Mr Paul Bowen KC
- The MPTS proceedings: Part 2
- The first appellant
- The second appellant
- Dr Strommer’s position
- Grounds 1-5: The effect of the previous judicial review proceedings
- Res judicata: legal framework
- The appellants’ submissions
- The respondent’s submissions
- Discussion
- Grounds 1-5 : The abuse of process decision
- Grounds 2, 4 and 5
- Ground 6
- Appeal against sanction: Grounds 7 and 8
- Conclusions