AC-2024-LON-001145 - [2025] EWHC 2075 (Admin)

As regards the second appellant, the MPTS identified as aggravating factors that he had put his own interests before those of his patients and failed to listen to other governance bodies and doctors when they told him that what he was doing was wrong. He had failed to demonstrate meaningful insight and remediation.

The Tribunal identified mitigating factors. There was no evidence of any previous or subsequent fitness to practise concerns and no evidence of actual harm to patients. The Tribunal determined that suspension was appropriate and that a duration of two months was sufficient to mark the nature and the seriousness of the misconduct.