Mr Justice Linden
Mr Justice Linden :
Introduction
The Claimant, who is a 25 year old Portuguese national, is currently the subject of two extradition claims. The first is a request which was made by the Government of the United States of America (“the USA”) on 23 March 2022 (“the Request”) and certified by the Defendant (“the SSHD”) on 31 March 2022 under Part 2 of the Extradition Act 2003. The second is an arrest warrant which was issued by the Regional Department of Investigations, Porto, (“Portugal”) on 14 February 2024 (“the Warrant”) and certified by the National Crime Agency on 27 February 2024 under Part 1 of the 2003 Act. Both the Request and the Warrant seek his extradition to stand trial on charges which substantially overlap in terms of the offending to which they relate.
On 28 July 2023, an order for the extradition of the Claimant to the USA pursuant to the Request was made by the SSHD, although his extradition is currently the subject of an appeal to the High Court which was stayed pending the outcome of these judicial review proceedings (“the Claim”) by order of Julian Knowles J dated 6 June 2024. On 6 March 2024, the Claimant gave consent for his extradition to Portugal pursuant to the Warrant and the Westminster Magistrates’ Court ordered his extradition to Portugal although this order was quashed, also by consent, by order of Choudhury J on 20 June 2025.
In the meantime, on 14 March 2024, the SSHD decided, pursuant to section 179(2) of the Extradition Act 2003, to defer proceedings on the Warrant until the Request has been disposed of. It is this decision (“the Decision”) which the Claimant, whose preference is to be extradited to Portugal rather than the USA, challenges.
The Claim Form was filed on 24 May 2024. On 19 December 2024, Choudhury J ordered a rolled up hearing of the Claimant’s application for permission with the determination of the Claim to follow immediately if permission were granted.
- Heading
- Mr Justice Linden
- The issues for determination
- Summary of my decision
- Outline of the key features of the statutory framework for present purposes
- The facts
- The request for the extradition of the Claimant by the USA
- The decision of the Westminster Magistrates’ Court in relation to the USA’s request for the extradition of the Claimant
- The referral of the Claimant under the National Referral Mechanism
- The Claimant’s appeal against the order for his extradition pursuant to the Request
- The Portuguese arrest warrant
- The order for the extradition of the Claimant pursuant to the Warrant and the Claimant’s second claim for judicial review
- The evidence about the SSHD’s decision on 14 March 2024
- Annex A to the Submission
- The discovery of errors as to Annex B to the Submission and other information which was before the SSHD at the time of the Decision
- The contents of Annex B, so far as is material
- The SSHD’s Order
- Attempts on behalf of the Claimant to make representations
- Ground 1: breach of the duty to act fairly?
- The Claimant’s argument
- The submissions on behalf of Portugal
- The argument on behalf of the SSHD
- The USA’s submissions
- Discussion
- Conclusion on Ground 1
- Ground 2: mistake of fact?
- The arguments of the parties
- Discussion of Ground 2
- Ground 3: failure to take into account relevant considerations
- The arguments of the parties
- Discussion
- Ground 4: breach of section 6 of the Human Rights Act 1998
- The Claimant’s argument
- Discussion and conclusion
- Ground 5: breach of Article 4 ECHR and the ECAT
- Discussion
- Section 31 (2A) of the Senior Courts Act 1981
- The Additional Point
- Discussion
- Conclusions
![AC-2024-LON-001762 - [2025] EWHC 2293 (Admin)](https://backend.juristeca.com/files/emisores/logo_fi51A75.png)