![CA-2025-001983 - [2025] EWCA Civ 1311](https://backend.juristeca.com/files/emisores/logo_Sjvxvlx.png){kind=logo}
Heading
ON APPEAL FROM THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE
KING’S BENCH DIVISION
ADMINISTRATIVE COURT
THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE CHAMBERLAIN
Royal Courts of Justice
Strand, London, WC2A 2LL
Before :
THE LADY CARR OF WALTON-ON THE-HILL,
THE LADY CHIEF JUSTICE OF ENGLAND AND WALES
LORD JUSTICE LEWIS
and
LORD JUSTICE EDIS
Between:
THE KING ON THE APPLICATION OF HUDA AMMORI | Respondent/Cross- Appellant |
- and - | |
SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE HOME DEPARTMENT | Appellant/ Cross-Respondent |
SirJames Eadie KC, David Blundell KC, Ben Watson KC, Andrew Deakin, Natasha Barnes, Stephen Kosmin and Karl Laird (instructed by the Government Legal Department) for the Appellant/Cross-Respondent
Raza Husain KC, Blinne Ní Ghrálaigh KC, Paul Luckhurst, Owen Greenhall, Audrey Cherryl Mogan, Mira Hammad, Rosalind Burgin and Grant Kynaston (instructed by Birnberg Peirce Solicitors) for the Respondent/Cross-Appellant
Tim Buley KC, Dominic Lewis and Jesse Nicholls (instructed by the Special Advocate Support Office) as Special Advocates by written submissions only
Hearing date: 25 September 2025
Approved Judgment
.............................
- Heading
- The Lady Carr of Walton-on-the-Hill CJ handed down the following judgment of the court
- THE STATUTORY FRAMEWORK
- THE FACTUAL BACKGROUND
- The Decision to Proscribe Palestine Action
- The issuing of the claim for judicial review and an application for interim relief
- The refusal of interim relief
- The hearing of the application for permission to apply for judicial review
- The Judge’s Order
- The Secretary of State’s appellant’s notice
- Ms Ammori’s respondent’s notice
- THE ISSUES
- THE FIRST ISSUE – ADEQUATE ALTERNATIVE REMEDIES
- Discussion
- The Present Case
- THE SECOND ISSUE – THE TIME LIMITS FOR APPLYING FOR PERMISSION TO APPEAL
- Discussion
- THE THIRD AND FOURTH ISSUES – THE EXTENSION OF TIME AND PERMISSION
- Conclusions