The Judge’s Order
The Judge’s Order
The Judge made an order dated 6 August 2025 and sealed on 7 August 2025. Paragraph 1 of the order dealt with procedural matters. Paragraphs 2 to 4 are headed “Preliminary Issue” and provide:
“2. The Court determines as a preliminary issue that an application to the Defendant to deproscribe Palestine Action, coupled with an appeal to the Proscribed Organisation Appeal Commission, is not a suitable remedy.
3. The Defendant’s application for permission to appeal on the preliminary issue is refused.
4. Any application by the Defendant for permission to appeal to the Court of Appeal on the preliminary issue is to be filed by 4 p.m. on 6 August 2025.”
Paragraphs 5 and 6 are headed “Permission and interim relief” and provide:
“5. The Claimant’s application for permission to apply for judicial review is:
(a) refused on grounds 1,3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and
(b) granted on grounds 2 and 8.
6. The Claimant’s renewed application for interim relief is refused.”
The remainder of the order dealt with other applications and directions.
- Heading
- The Lady Carr of Walton-on-the-Hill CJ handed down the following judgment of the court
- THE STATUTORY FRAMEWORK
- THE FACTUAL BACKGROUND
- The Decision to Proscribe Palestine Action
- The issuing of the claim for judicial review and an application for interim relief
- The refusal of interim relief
- The hearing of the application for permission to apply for judicial review
- The Judge’s Order
- The Secretary of State’s appellant’s notice
- Ms Ammori’s respondent’s notice
- THE ISSUES
- THE FIRST ISSUE – ADEQUATE ALTERNATIVE REMEDIES
- Discussion
- The Present Case
- THE SECOND ISSUE – THE TIME LIMITS FOR APPLYING FOR PERMISSION TO APPEAL
- Discussion
- THE THIRD AND FOURTH ISSUES – THE EXTENSION OF TIME AND PERMISSION
- Conclusions
![CA-2025-001983 - [2025] EWCA Civ 1311](https://backend.juristeca.com/files/emisores/logo_Sjvxvlx.png)