![CA-2025-001983 - [2025] EWCA Civ 1311](https://backend.juristeca.com/files/emisores/logo_Sjvxvlx.png){kind=logo}
Ms Ammori’s respondent’s notice
Ms Ammori’s respondent’s notice
Ms Ammori filed a respondent’s notice on 3 September 2025. Section 4 identified the part of the order that she sought to appeal as paragraphs 2 (dealing with the preliminary issue) and paragraph 5 (dealing with the refusal of permission to apply for judicial review on grounds 1,3,4 5, 6, and 7 and granting permission on grounds 2 and 8). In section 6, the respondent’s notice says “In respect of paragraph 2 of the Order”, Ms Ammori was seeking to uphold that paragraph on certain additional grounds. It goes on to say that “In respect of paragraph 5(a) of the Order”, Ms Ammori sought permission to appeal paragraph 5(a) of the order in respect of grounds 1, 5, 6 and 7.
- Heading
- The Lady Carr of Walton-on-the-Hill CJ handed down the following judgment of the court
- THE STATUTORY FRAMEWORK
- THE FACTUAL BACKGROUND
- The Decision to Proscribe Palestine Action
- The issuing of the claim for judicial review and an application for interim relief
- The refusal of interim relief
- The hearing of the application for permission to apply for judicial review
- The Judge’s Order
- The Secretary of State’s appellant’s notice
- Ms Ammori’s respondent’s notice
- THE ISSUES
- THE FIRST ISSUE – ADEQUATE ALTERNATIVE REMEDIES
- Discussion
- The Present Case
- THE SECOND ISSUE – THE TIME LIMITS FOR APPLYING FOR PERMISSION TO APPEAL
- Discussion
- THE THIRD AND FOURTH ISSUES – THE EXTENSION OF TIME AND PERMISSION
- Conclusions