Mr Holloway’s application to vary the Freezing Order
Mr Holloway’s application to vary the Freezing Order
On 14 February 2024 Mr Holloway applied to vary the order dated 5 January 2024 and for other relief, including a declaration that Mold had failed to comply with its duty of full and frank disclosure when applying to extend the Freezing Order. In his fifth affidavit in support of this application Mr Holloway denied that he or his wife had anything to do with the Malicious Communications.
Mr Holloway later withdrew his application for much of the relief sought. The remainder of the application was dismissed by Richard Smith J on 22 March 2024. Richard Smith J noted in his judgment that Mr Holloway and Mr Jacques vehemently denied the genuineness of the evidence on which the Freezing Order and its extension had been obtained.
- Heading
- Introduction
- The procedural history
- Mold’s substantive claim
- Mold’s application for a freezing order
- Mr Holloway’s application for an imaging order
- Mr Holloway’s request for evidence to be preserved
- Amended Particulars of Claim and Defences
- Mold and Mr O’Grady’s application for a Norwich Pharmacal order
- Mold’s application for extension of the Freezing Order
- Mr Holloway’s application to search and review the data from Mr Hazlehurst’s phone
- Mr Holloway’s application to vary the Freezing Order
- The Bankers’ Books application
- Mr Jacques’ application to set aside the Freezing Order and the Bankers’ Books Order
- The CYFOR report
- Joinder of the Third to Seventh Defendants
- Developments in the Leeds Proceedings
- The contempt application
- Mr Holloway instructs CCL
- Mr Holloway’s application to set aside the Freezing Order
- The directions hearing
- The judgment
- Conclusions
![CA-2025-000783 - [2025] EWCA Civ 986](https://backend.juristeca.com/files/emisores/logo_Sjvxvlx.png)