The procedural history
The procedural history
In order to put the issue on the appeal into its proper context, it is necessary to set out a regrettably lengthy history of these proceedings and two related sets of proceedings. Even this account is necessarily an incomplete one, partly because not all of the history is relevant and partly because the parties sensibly did not burden this Court with all of the relevant documentation. The parties did, however, provide the Court with a helpful agreed chronology.
- Heading
- Introduction
- The procedural history
- Mold’s substantive claim
- Mold’s application for a freezing order
- Mr Holloway’s application for an imaging order
- Mr Holloway’s request for evidence to be preserved
- Amended Particulars of Claim and Defences
- Mold and Mr O’Grady’s application for a Norwich Pharmacal order
- Mold’s application for extension of the Freezing Order
- Mr Holloway’s application to search and review the data from Mr Hazlehurst’s phone
- Mr Holloway’s application to vary the Freezing Order
- The Bankers’ Books application
- Mr Jacques’ application to set aside the Freezing Order and the Bankers’ Books Order
- The CYFOR report
- Joinder of the Third to Seventh Defendants
- Developments in the Leeds Proceedings
- The contempt application
- Mr Holloway instructs CCL
- Mr Holloway’s application to set aside the Freezing Order
- The directions hearing
- The judgment
- Conclusions
![CA-2025-000783 - [2025] EWCA Civ 986](https://backend.juristeca.com/files/emisores/logo_Sjvxvlx.png)