Appleton v Gallagher [2015] EWHC 2689
(Fam)
)
. (9)
Although in most cases, confidentiality can be protected by publishing judgments in an anonymised and redacted form, there are some rare cases where the factual matrix is unique or so unusual that confidentiality can only be protected by withholding the judgment from publication altogether. One example is the judgment in the so-called "Scottish case" delivered by Mostyn J which has never been published but was subsequently cited by the same judge in
- The Hon. Mr Justice Cohen :
- Appleton v Gallagher & others [2015]
- EWHC 2689 (Fam)
- Sir Frederick Barclay
- The Court Order
- H’s submissions
- W’s submissions
- The Media
- The wider family (The Interested Parties)
- Discussion
- XW v XH (No.2) [2018] EWFC 44
- [1913] AC 417
- Family Procedure Rules ("FPR") rule 27.10
- Clibbery v Allen
- [2005] 1 AC 593
- , [2012]
- Lykiardopulo
- (Fam)
- Appleton v Gallagher [2015] EWHC 2689
- [2017] EWFC 25
- [2010] EWCA Civ 1315
- McCartney v Mills
- McCartney [2008] EWH 401 (Fam)
- the press
- The criticisms made of H
- FLR 681
- Conclusion