McCartney [2008] EWH 401 (Fam)
where the choice was either to sanction or to refuse publication. It is agreed between all parties that anonymisation/redaction is not possible in this case if its purpose is to protect the identity of the parties. 24.I had been attracted to the idea of a summary of the judgment being made public. This is not a course that I or the parties know to have been taken in previous financial cases but that it exists as at least a possibility is made clear by paragraph 34 of Lykiardopulo which reads “if a case in advance and during its course has generated press interest and speculation the judge may release the judgment or
- The Hon. Mr Justice Cohen :
- Appleton v Gallagher & others [2015]
- EWHC 2689 (Fam)
- Sir Frederick Barclay
- The Court Order
- H’s submissions
- W’s submissions
- The Media
- The wider family (The Interested Parties)
- Discussion
- XW v XH (No.2) [2018] EWFC 44
- [1913] AC 417
- Family Procedure Rules ("FPR") rule 27.10
- Clibbery v Allen
- [2005] 1 AC 593
- , [2012]
- Lykiardopulo
- (Fam)
- Appleton v Gallagher [2015] EWHC 2689
- [2017] EWFC 25
- [2010] EWCA Civ 1315
- McCartney v Mills
- McCartney [2008] EWH 401 (Fam)
- the press
- The criticisms made of H
- FLR 681
- Conclusion
