Case No. ZC19D00073

, where at paragraph 24 he had granted an injunction prohibiting the media from publishing any report of the case that … (b) refers to or concerns any of the parties’ financial information whether of a personal or business nature … 5.I was anxious that a hearing taking place against what appeared to be a tight timetable might be disrupted by arguments about what was and what was not ‘the parties’ financial information’. Mr Farmer, speaking on behalf of the media, hypothesised certain situations where evidence might be given which the media wished to be free to publish and which would not be financial information. I determined that there should be no publication of the hearing beyond the identity of the parties and their representatives but said that if information or evidence was given during the hearing which it was asserted was not the parties’ financial information and which the media wished to publish, I would hear an application in respect of that material. No such application was made at any stage of the trial. 6.I now have to determine whether or not my judgment should be published either in full or in part and whether the RRO should remain in place. 7.Before I turn to the positions of the parties and the interested parties, I should refer to the limited measure of agreement that has emerged between the parties. Both sides agree that the award and the open position of each party should be made public. They were as follows: