![FT/EA/2024/0427 - [2025] UKFTT 01126 (GRC)](https://backend.juristeca.com/files/emisores/logo_kmf8vDg.png){kind=logo}
First-tier Tribunal (General Regulatory Chamber)
FT/EA/2024/0427 - [2025] UKFTT 01126 (GRC)
Fecha: 24-Sep-2025
Discussions and conclusions
Discussions and conclusions
Whilst we have been referred to the First-tier Tribunal decision in Edward Williams v (i) The Information Commissioner and (ii) the Home Office [2024] UKFTT 00003, we are not bound by that decision and we have not been assisted by it.
We note that the scope of the request relates to “training material regarding push back at sea”. We have therefore confined our considerations regarding the contents to the SOP to material that falls within the scope of the request. We are satisfied that the entirety of the PowerPoint falls within the scope of the request.
- Heading
- Introduction
- Factual background
- The relevant information held in response to the request
- The request and responses
- Decision notice
- Grounds of Appeal
- The response of the Commissioner
- The Appellant’s reply to the Commissioner’s response
- The response on behalf of the Home Office (Second Respondent)
- Legal Framework
- The public interest balance
- The role of the Tribunal
- Issues
- Evidence
- Discussions and conclusions
- Would disclosure of the requested material prejudice or be likely to prejudice the prevention or detection of crime?
- Would disclosure of the requested material prejudice or be likely to prejudice the operation of the immigration controls?
- Public interest balance
- Section 42 of FOIA
- Ancillary issues
- Gist
- Conclusions