![FT/EA/2024/0427 - [2025] UKFTT 01126 (GRC)](https://backend.juristeca.com/files/emisores/logo_kmf8vDg.png){kind=logo}
First-tier Tribunal (General Regulatory Chamber)
FT/EA/2024/0427 - [2025] UKFTT 01126 (GRC)
Fecha: 24-Sep-2025
Evidence
Evidence
We read and took account of:
An open bundle comprising of 149 pages (including indexes);
A closed bundle comprising of 76 pages (including indexes) containing the withheld material and the closed witness statement of Daniel Tobias Whale;
A ‘Gist of information redacted in the closed witness statement of Daniel Tobias Whale’ which was disclosed to all parties.
The Tribunal is satisfied that it is necessary to withhold the closed bundle from the Appellant on the basis that to do otherwise would defeat the purpose of the appeal.
- Heading
- Introduction
- Factual background
- The relevant information held in response to the request
- The request and responses
- Decision notice
- Grounds of Appeal
- The response of the Commissioner
- The Appellant’s reply to the Commissioner’s response
- The response on behalf of the Home Office (Second Respondent)
- Legal Framework
- The public interest balance
- The role of the Tribunal
- Issues
- Evidence
- Discussions and conclusions
- Would disclosure of the requested material prejudice or be likely to prejudice the prevention or detection of crime?
- Would disclosure of the requested material prejudice or be likely to prejudice the operation of the immigration controls?
- Public interest balance
- Section 42 of FOIA
- Ancillary issues
- Gist
- Conclusions