Failure to provide full information?
Failure to provide full information?
In relation to HMRC’s statement that the Appellant had failed to provide “the full information requested”, I said I had considered the correspondence between the parties, and I referred to that set out at §11 of this PTA Decision. I went on to cite the Appellant’s summary of the position, again already set out at §10, namely that:
In the course of the SMR compliance check, HMRC had asked 81 individual questions.
The Appellant sent HMRC over 1,000 pages of detailed and relevant evidence.
The Appellant had answered all the questions asked of it, before the appeal was made to the Tribunal.
In the context of the wider Partnership enquiries, 284 questions have been asked by HMRC and in excess of 4,000 pages of evidence has been provide by the Appellant to HMRC.
I then said that although I had “not been provided with all the correspondence between the parties, it is clear from the foregoing that this not a case where HMRC have not been provided with full information”.
- Heading
- Introduction
- Publication of this decision
- The Salaried Member Rules
- The Compliance Check
- The Determinations
- The Appeal
- The F&B Application
- The First Decision
- The case law
- Schedule 36
- Duty to give reasons and Reg 80
- The Tribunal Rules
- Overall conclusion
- The PTA application in relation to the First Decision
- The case law
- The Grounds of the PTA Application
- Ground 1: Rule 20
- Ground 2: duty to give reasons
- Ground 3: burden of proof
- Ground 4: positive case
- Ground 5: case management of the appeal
- Ground 6: 4Site
- Ground 7
- Overall conclusion on the PTA Application relating to the First Decision
- The Statement of case
- The SoC Application
- The law
- Failure to provide full information?
- Failure to provide “any evidence of what the SMR position is”
- Acceptance in correspondence that the SMR had been incorrectly applied?
- Reliance on the fraud?
- Out of time Determinations
- Overall conclusion
- Directions
- PTA Application in relation to the Second Decision
- A bare assertion?
- The TMA
- The case law
- Duty to give reasons
- Discerning the Appellant’s case?
- The Directions
- Barring Order
- Other submissions
- Other
- Next steps
![TC09548 - [2025] UKFTT 00700 (TC)](https://backend.juristeca.com/files/emisores/logo_7HSuEAV.png)