The Tribunal Rules
The Tribunal Rules
Under the heading “the Tribunal Rules”, I said:
“The Appellant filed its grounds of appeal in accordance with Rule 20 of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Tax Chamber) Rules 2009 (the Tribunal Rules). The grounds were put forward on the basis of the information available to the Appellant, which was not derived from the Determinations or a covering letter. The Appellant did all it could. There is thus no basis for the Tribunal to direct that the Appellant provide F&B particulars.
Rule 25 headed “Respondent’s Statement of Case”, and so far as relevant, reads (emphasis added):
“A respondent must send or deliver a statement of case to the Tribunal, the appellant and any other respondent so that it is received—
(a)-(b) ,,,
(c) in a Standard or Complex case…within 60 days after the Tribunal sent the notice of appeal or a copy of the application notice or notice of reference.
(2) A statement of case must—
(a) in an appeal, state the legislative provision under which the decision under appeal was made; and
(b) set out the respondent's position in relation to the case.”
Thus, once the Appellant has satisfied Rule 20, HMRC “must” set out its position.”
- Heading
- Introduction
- Publication of this decision
- The Salaried Member Rules
- The Compliance Check
- The Determinations
- The Appeal
- The F&B Application
- The First Decision
- The case law
- Schedule 36
- Duty to give reasons and Reg 80
- The Tribunal Rules
- Overall conclusion
- The PTA application in relation to the First Decision
- The case law
- The Grounds of the PTA Application
- Ground 1: Rule 20
- Ground 2: duty to give reasons
- Ground 3: burden of proof
- Ground 4: positive case
- Ground 5: case management of the appeal
- Ground 6: 4Site
- Ground 7
- Overall conclusion on the PTA Application relating to the First Decision
- The Statement of case
- The SoC Application
- The law
- Failure to provide full information?
- Failure to provide “any evidence of what the SMR position is”
- Acceptance in correspondence that the SMR had been incorrectly applied?
- Reliance on the fraud?
- Out of time Determinations
- Overall conclusion
- Directions
- PTA Application in relation to the Second Decision
- A bare assertion?
- The TMA
- The case law
- Duty to give reasons
- Discerning the Appellant’s case?
- The Directions
- Barring Order
- Other submissions
- Other
- Next steps
![TC09548 - [2025] UKFTT 00700 (TC)](https://backend.juristeca.com/files/emisores/logo_7HSuEAV.png)