Claim No: IP-2022-000066 - [2024] EWHC 1369 (IPEC)

I am satisfied that KK and some of the Franchisee Defendants are still using Sign 1, Sign 2 and Sign 3. The evidence before me at trial was that the 3^rd Defendant, 4^th Defendant and 6^th Defendant have all ceased trading as Metro’s franchisees. I will hear updated submissions on this at the consequentials hearing following the handing down of this judgment, as there was a suggestion that others of the Franchisee Defendants may be considering the same. However, I am satisfied that the Claimant is entitled to injunctive relief against those Defendants who are still using the Signs.