[2025] EWHC 2307 (KB)
King's / Queen's Bench Division of the High Court

[2025] EWHC 2307 (KB)

Fecha: 16-Jul-2025

Defendants

Defendants

98.

The defendants’ accepted offer to the claimants amounted to £1 million per week of trial. The equivalent figures for Tranche 2 for the Lead and ALGLO defendants was an allowance of either £4 million or £5 million. The claimants have offered £4 million and three of the four defendants whose fees remain in dispute have counter proposed £4.5 million. In our view there is an appropriateness to the claimants’ budget being twice that of any individual defendant’s budget and so we prefer the claimants’ offer of £4 million. We do not agree that the Nissan Authorised Dealerships are in an equivalent position to the Non-ALGLO defendants given their larger role. We have allowed the sum claimed (and which is therefore similar to the sum allowed for the trial phase).

99.

Uniquely, the claimants’ offer of £65,000 for this phase has been rejected by all of the Non-ALGLO defendants. It became clear during the oral submissions that at least part of this rejection resulted from the expected cost of the Opus 2 services taking a considerable sum from the budget. This was not a consistent figure but more than one defendant recorded a disbursement of over £11,000 for this item, or 17% of the offered budget.

100.

Seven of the Non-ALGLO defendants have budgeted between roughly £80,000 and £95,000. In our view, these sums are in the correct area to allow for suitable brief fees, the Opus 2 charges and the solicitors’ time for preparing for the limited involvement in the Quantum Trial. The other three defendants have claimed approximately £145,000, £155,000 or £225,000 which cannot be reasonable in our view. The common thread in these three budgets is the extensive use of leading and junior counsel estimated at £95,000 to £150,000. Many of the other defendants have budgeted for the input of both leading and junior counsel but at a much more proportionate expense. It is a matter for these defendants as to how they cut their legal cloth but the difference between the total cost of doing so is currently stark.

101.

The claimants’ offer of £65,000 is based on the Tranche 2 allowance of £50,000. We do not think that offer is sufficient; regardless of the figure arrived at for Tranche 2. Adding a sum for the Opus 2 charges brings us to a figure of £80,000 and we have therefore decided that proposed budgets between £80,000 and 20% above that sum (£96,000) should be allowed and budgets in excess of that top figure should be restricted to it.