Individual Statements of Case
Individual Statements of Case
Claimants
The individual statements of case concerning quantum are, in our view, plainly less complex than the pleadings in Tranche 2. The figures in this phase are far too high for the work required. In the Lead and ALGLO budget the claim for approximately £300,000 for expert input appears to have no regard to the amount of expert input claimed in the GLO specific budgets in this phase, let alone in other phases. Excluding that cost and reducing the need for conferences with counsel as a result, reduces the figure to £100,000.
For the GLO specific budgets, both the amount of time claimed for solicitors and the level of experts’ fees were significantly too high. The involvement of counsel was limited. Although the percentage reductions are significant (over 50%), we were still a little concerned by the resulting figures for this phase.
- Heading
- Mrs Justice Cockerill DBE and Senior Costs Judge Rowley
- Background
- Lessons learned from the first CMH
- Stress testing “over lawyering”
- The comparison with Tranche 2
- Standard figures or a range of reasonable and proportionate costs?
- Claimants’ budgets generally: Lead Firms & Others
- Defendants’ budgets generally: Amount of costs actually being incurred
- CMCs and PTR
- Co-ordination
- Defendants
- Section 13
- Defendants
- Selecting Sample Claimants
- Defendants
- Individual Statements of Case
- Defendants
- Disclosure
- Defendants
- Witness statements
- Defendants
- Defendants
- Quantum Trial Preparation
- Defendants
- Quantum Trial
- Defendants
- Second General Phases – GLO Management Costs
- Second General Phases: Fortnightly Meetings
- The non-budgeted phases: Expert Reports and ADR / Settlement
- Conclusions
![[2025] EWHC 2307 (KB)](https://backend.juristeca.com/files/emisores/logo_AJKZXmE.png)