![[2025] EWHC 2307 (KB)](https://backend.juristeca.com/files/emisores/logo_AJKZXmE.png){kind=logo}
Selecting Sample Claimants
Selecting Sample Claimants
Claimants
The question of which solicitors should be involved in this work has already been discussed. The sums allowed reflect the assumption that the work is carried out by the lead solicitors. If there is delegation to other solicitors, that should not result in additional time claimed between the parties.
The budgets regarding the ALGLOs were identical once any non-lead solicitor work was removed. The additional sum for Mercedes allows for a proportion of the time of the firms on the steering committee in addition to the lead solicitors in respect of this phase.
- Heading
- Mrs Justice Cockerill DBE and Senior Costs Judge Rowley
- Background
- Lessons learned from the first CMH
- Stress testing “over lawyering”
- The comparison with Tranche 2
- Standard figures or a range of reasonable and proportionate costs?
- Claimants’ budgets generally: Lead Firms & Others
- Defendants’ budgets generally: Amount of costs actually being incurred
- CMCs and PTR
- Co-ordination
- Defendants
- Section 13
- Defendants
- Selecting Sample Claimants
- Defendants
- Individual Statements of Case
- Defendants
- Disclosure
- Defendants
- Witness statements
- Defendants
- Defendants
- Quantum Trial Preparation
- Defendants
- Quantum Trial
- Defendants
- Second General Phases – GLO Management Costs
- Second General Phases: Fortnightly Meetings
- The non-budgeted phases: Expert Reports and ADR / Settlement
- Conclusions