Disclosure
Disclosure
Claimants
The parties are a long way apart as to the extent of the disclosure exercise but it is evident that there is, in any event, far too much expert and counsel input in this phase. The experts will identify missing documents as part of their substantive reporting (in the expert report phase) in any event. Much of the time claimed relates to conferences said to relate to third-party data, comparators and reviewing the defendants’ disclosure.
There can only be a modest co-ordinating role at the Lead and ALGLO level regarding disclosure and that is reflected more accurately in our view by the defendants’ offer.
In relation to the GLO specific budgets, the solicitors’ time was broadly similar and the amounts for counsel, the experts and the Database hosting were identical, save for Mercedes (but which were still similar). The amount of £950,000 included a notional allowance of 2,000 hours of solicitors’ time.
- Heading
- Mrs Justice Cockerill DBE and Senior Costs Judge Rowley
- Background
- Lessons learned from the first CMH
- Stress testing “over lawyering”
- The comparison with Tranche 2
- Standard figures or a range of reasonable and proportionate costs?
- Claimants’ budgets generally: Lead Firms & Others
- Defendants’ budgets generally: Amount of costs actually being incurred
- CMCs and PTR
- Co-ordination
- Defendants
- Section 13
- Defendants
- Selecting Sample Claimants
- Defendants
- Individual Statements of Case
- Defendants
- Disclosure
- Defendants
- Witness statements
- Defendants
- Defendants
- Quantum Trial Preparation
- Defendants
- Quantum Trial
- Defendants
- Second General Phases – GLO Management Costs
- Second General Phases: Fortnightly Meetings
- The non-budgeted phases: Expert Reports and ADR / Settlement
- Conclusions
![[2025] EWHC 2307 (KB)](https://backend.juristeca.com/files/emisores/logo_AJKZXmE.png)