Mr Smith’s Fees
Mr Smith’s Fees
It is convenient to consider at this stage a counterclaim/contracharge put forward by J&BH for the fees charged by Mr Smith.
This concerns the fees charged by Mr Smith for rendering his Decision in the sum of £13,962.
When I rendered my judgment enforcing Mr Smith’s decision, I ordered in the usual way that A & V should pay his fees in the usual way.
That judgment was subsequently stayed by me pending this trial and judgment following that trial.
In this judgment I have reached a different conclusion as to the balance due between the Parties from that reached by Mr Smith.
In my judgment, as with Mr Blizzard’s fees, the appropriate course to adopt is to invite the submissions of the Parties on this head of claim after they have had the opportunity to consider this judgment.
- Heading
- Introduction
- Representation
- Summary of the Claim
- Summary of Account
- Contractual Provisions
- The Non-Expert Witnesses
- Expert Evidence
- The History of the Sub-Contract and Sub-Contract Works
- A & V’s Allegations of Breaches of Contract
- Measured Works
- Variations
- A & V Loss and Expense/Breaches Cost Recovery
- Loss and Expense
- Mr Blizzard’s Fees
- Mr Smith’s Fees
- Loss of profits on incomplete work
- Claim for overheads
- Claim for directors and consultants’ time
- Loss of business opportunity
- Claim for damage to business and reputation
- The Counterclaims
- Conclusions
![HT-2023-000006 - [2024] EWHC 1510 (TCC)](https://backend.juristeca.com/files/emisores/logo_yJUntHA.png)