C: LAW
C: LAW
Inclusion in the lists
The relevant legislation is in the Safeguarding Vulnerable Groups Act 2006 (‘the Act’). Inclusion in the children’s barred list is governed by section 2 and Part 1 of Schedule 3 to the Act. Inclusion in the adults’ barred list is governed by section 2 and Part 2 of Schedule 3. There are three separate ways in which a person may be included in the barred lists under Schedule 3 to the Act. DBS took two parallel routes to barring in this case.
The first route which was followed here is referred to as ‘autobar with representations’, and relates to the conviction. A person can be included in the lists if they meet prescribed criteria. The person who is proposed to be barred has a right to make representations to the DBS under paragraphs 2 and 8 of Schedule 3 to the Act. The prescribed criteria include a conviction for specified criminal offences, among them possessing an indecent image of a child. It is agreed that this appellant was convicted of two such offences.
Where the DBS is satisfied that the prescribed criteria apply, the effect of paragraphs 2(6), (2)(8), 8(6) or 8(8) of Schedule 3 to the Act is that the DBS must include the person in the children’s or adults’ barred list if it:
has reason to believe that the person is or has been, or might in future be, engaged in regulated activity relating to [children or adults], and
where, as here, the person has made representations regarding their inclusion, the DBS is satisfied that it is appropriate to include the person in the children's or adults’ barred list.
The DBS barred the appellant under this route, having received his representations and determined that he had a conviction for a specified offence, was engaged in regulated activity as a pharmacist, and that it was appropriate to include him in both lists. Under this route the relevant conviction is a finding of fact, and there is no requirement to establish relevant conduct or risk of harm.
The third route, referred to as discretionary barring, was also followed here. Under paragraphs 3(3) and 9(3) of Schedule 3 the DBS must include the person in the children’s and adults’ barred list if:
it is satisfied that the person has engaged in relevant conduct, and
it has reason to believe that the person is or has been or might in future be, engaged in regulated activity relating to children or vulnerable adults, and
it is satisfied that it is appropriate to include the person in the list.
‘Relevant conduct’ is defined under paragraphs 4 and 10 of Schedule 3 to the Act which are set out below, paragraph 4 relating to the children’s list and paragraph 10 relating to the adults’ list:
4(1)For the purposes of paragraph 3 relevant conduct is—
(a)conduct which endangers a child or is likely to endanger a child;
(b)conduct which, if repeated against or in relation to a child, would endanger that child or would be likely to endanger him;
(c)conduct involving sexual material relating to children (including possession of such material);
(d)conduct involving sexually explicit images depicting violence against human beings (including possession of such images), if it appears to DBS that the conduct is inappropriate;
(e)conduct of a sexual nature involving a child, if it appears to DBS that the conduct is inappropriate.
10(1)For the purposes of paragraph 9 relevant conduct is—
(a)conduct which endangers a vulnerable adult or is likely to endanger a vulnerable adult;
(b)conduct which, if repeated against or in relation to a vulnerable adult, would endanger that adult or would be likely to endanger him;
(c)conduct involving sexual material relating to children (including possession of such material);
(d)conduct involving sexually explicit images depicting violence against human beings (including possession of such images), if it appears to DBS that the conduct is inappropriate;
(e)conduct of a sexual nature involving a vulnerable adult, if it appears to DBS that the conduct is inappropriate.
Further definitions follow in those paragraphs. It should be noted that relevant conduct includes possession of sexual material relating to children, in relation to both the children’s and adults’ lists.
- Heading
- The appeal is dismissed
- The DBS decision
- Further material
- Permission to appeal decision
- C: LAW
- Upper Tribunal Powers on Appeal
- Proportionality: Case Law
- The Court of Appeal in Dalston Projects thus reaffirmed that the first-instance court determines proportionality for itself, giving appropriate respect and weight to the initial decision-maker. The fi
- Proportionality: DBS submissions and our approach
- D. THE HEARING
- Conclusions
![[2024] UKUT 330 (AAC)](https://backend.juristeca.com/files/emisores/logo_3a2BKne.png)