Heading

IN THE UPPER TRIBUNAL ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS CHAMBER | Appeal No. UA-2024-000025-V [2024] UKUT 330 (AAC) |
On appeal from a decision of the Disclosure and Barring Service
Between: | MFAG | Appellant |
and | ||
The Disclosure and Barring Service | Respondent |
Before: Upper Tribunal Judge Brunner KC, Michele Tynan and Elizabeth Stuart-Cole
Decided on 15 October 2024 following an oral hearing, held by consent by video, on 3 October 2024
Representation:
Appellant: Mr Bajwa KC
DBS: Mr Bayne
ANONYMITY ORDER The Upper Tribunal makes the following order: “1. Pursuant to rule 14(1) of the Tribunal Procedure (Upper Tribunal) Rules 2008, I prohibit the disclosure or publication of— (a) the applicant’s name; (b) any matter likely to lead members of the public to identify that name. 2. Any breach of the order at paragraph 1 above is liable to be treated as a contempt of court and punished accordingly (see section 25 of the Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Act 2007).” |
DECISION
- Heading
- The appeal is dismissed
- The DBS decision
- Further material
- Permission to appeal decision
- C: LAW
- Upper Tribunal Powers on Appeal
- Proportionality: Case Law
- The Court of Appeal in Dalston Projects thus reaffirmed that the first-instance court determines proportionality for itself, giving appropriate respect and weight to the initial decision-maker. The fi
- Proportionality: DBS submissions and our approach
- D. THE HEARING
- Conclusions
![[2024] UKUT 330 (AAC)](https://backend.juristeca.com/files/emisores/logo_3a2BKne.png)