Further material
Further material
Some further documents have been provided since the DBS made its decision:
A police report summarising analysis of MFAG’s laptop (p465) was provided on 4 April 2024 to the Upper Tribunal. It was not available to DBS at the time of the decision which it took. There is very little further material in this report, because the police had quoted from it extensively in the appellant’s police interview, which the DBS did have.
Information about a different case considered by GPhC, in which a person with more serious convictions was not removed from the professional register. We do not find that matter of any assistance to us; it related to assessment of a different person’s risk in a different context.
- Heading
- The appeal is dismissed
- The DBS decision
- Further material
- Permission to appeal decision
- C: LAW
- Upper Tribunal Powers on Appeal
- Proportionality: Case Law
- The Court of Appeal in Dalston Projects thus reaffirmed that the first-instance court determines proportionality for itself, giving appropriate respect and weight to the initial decision-maker. The fi
- Proportionality: DBS submissions and our approach
- D. THE HEARING
- Conclusions
![[2024] UKUT 330 (AAC)](https://backend.juristeca.com/files/emisores/logo_3a2BKne.png)