The structure of the Upper Tribunal’s decision
The structure of the Upper Tribunal’s decision
The following Table signposts the structure of our decision:
Subject matter | Paragraph(s) |
Introduction | 1-4 |
The structure of the Upper Tribunal’s decision | 5-6 |
Abbreviations | 7 |
Glossary | 8 |
The nature of Experian’s data processing | 9-12 |
The Information Commissioner’s Enforcement Notice | 13-21 |
Experian’s appeal to the First-tier Tribunal | 22-27 |
The Information Commissioner’s case before the First-tier Tribunal | 28-31 |
The hearing before the First-tier Tribunal | 32-33 |
The First-tier Tribunal’s decision: | |
The structure of the decision | 34 |
The First-tier Tribunal’s findings | 35-41 |
The First-tier Tribunal’s conclusions | 42-46 |
The Substituted Enforcement Notice | 47-48 |
The Information Commissioner’s grounds of appeal to the Upper Tribunal | 49-58 |
The legal framework: | 59 |
The Upper Tribunal’s “error of law” jurisdiction | 60-62 |
Adequacy of reasons | 63-66 |
Enforcement notices and appeals against them | 67-70 |
The GDPR | 71-82 |
Recitals to the GDPR | 83-88 |
Proportionality | 89-90 |
The EDPB: decisions and guidelines | 91-94 |
Summary of relevant aspects of the transparency principle in the GDPR | 95-96 |
The parties’ overarching submissions | 97-103 |
Ground 1: | |
The Information Commissioner’s submissions | 104-108 |
Experian’s submissions | 109-114 |
Alleged overarching errors: discussion and conclusions | 115-131 |
Alleged specific errors: discussion and conclusions | 132-142 |
Concluding observations on Ground 1 | 143 |
Ground 2: | |
The Information Commissioner’s submissions | 144-149 |
Experian’s submissions | 150-155 |
Alleged overarching error: discussion and conclusions | 156-160 |
Alleged specific errors: discussion and conclusions | 161-179 |
Concluding observations on Ground 2 | 180-181 |
Ground 3: | |
The Information Commissioner’s submissions | 182 |
Experian’s submissions | 183 |
Discussion and conclusions | 184-188 |
Ground 4 | 189 |
Ground 5: | |
The Information Commissioner’s submissions | 190-191 |
Experian’s submissions | 192 |
Discussion and conclusions | 193-196 |
Outcome | 197-198 |
We start our decision by dealing with some matters of terminology.
- Heading
- THE HON. MRS JUSTICE HEATHER WILLIAMS DBE
- Hearing dates: 6-8 February 2024
- The structure of the Upper Tribunal’s decision
- Abbreviations
- Glossary
- The nature of Experian’s data processing
- The Information Commissioner’s Enforcement Notice
- Experian’s appeal to the First-tier Tribunal
- The Information Commissioner’s case before the First-tier Tribunal
- The hearing before the First-tier Tribunal
- The First-tier Tribunal’s decision
- The First-tier Tribunal’s findings
- The First-tier Tribunal’s conclusions
- The Substituted Enforcement Notice
- The Information Commissioner’s grounds of appeal to the Upper Tribunal
- The legal framework
- The Upper Tribunal’s “error of law” jurisdiction
- Adequacy of reasons
- Enforcement notices and appeals against them
- Recitals to the GDPR
- Proportionality
- The European Data Protection Board: decisions and guidelines
- Summary of relevant aspects of the transparency principle in the GDPR
- The parties’ overarching submissions
- Ground 1
- Experian’s submissions
- Alleged overarching errors: discussion and conclusions
- Alleged failure to address Article 5(1)(a) GDPR
- Alleged failure to identify the applicable standard of transparency
- The nature of the processing
- Relevance of the reasonable expectations of data subjects
- Alleged specific errors: discussion and conclusions
- Use of hyperlinks to the CIP
- Suggestion that people do not care about what happens to their data
- How the FTT addressed the reasonable expectations of data subjects
- Concluding observations on Ground 1
- Ground 2
- Experian’s submissions
- Alleged overarching error: discussion and conclusion
- Alleged specific errors: discussion and conclusions
- Article 14(5)(a) and whether the data subject already “has” the information
- The route from the third party suppliers to the CIP
- Article 14(5)(b)
- Concluding observations on Ground 2
- Ground 3
- Experian’s submissions
- Discussion and conclusions
- Ground 5
- Experian’s submissions
- Discussion and conclusions
- Conclusions
![[2024] UKUT 105 (AAC)](https://backend.juristeca.com/files/emisores/logo_3a2BKne.png)