[2024] UKUT 105 (AAC)
Upper Tribunal Administrative Appeals Chamber

[2024] UKUT 105 (AAC)

Fecha: 22-Abr-2024

The structure of the Upper Tribunal’s decision

The structure of the Upper Tribunal’s decision

5.

The following Table signposts the structure of our decision:

Subject matter

Paragraph(s)

Introduction

1-4

The structure of the Upper Tribunal’s decision

5-6

Abbreviations

7

Glossary

8

The nature of Experian’s data processing

9-12

The Information Commissioner’s Enforcement Notice

13-21

Experian’s appeal to the First-tier Tribunal

22-27

The Information Commissioner’s case before the First-tier Tribunal

28-31

The hearing before the First-tier Tribunal

32-33

The First-tier Tribunal’s decision:

The structure of the decision

34

The First-tier Tribunal’s findings

35-41

The First-tier Tribunal’s conclusions

42-46

The Substituted Enforcement Notice

47-48

The Information Commissioner’s grounds of appeal to the Upper Tribunal

49-58

The legal framework:

59

The Upper Tribunal’s “error of law” jurisdiction

60-62

Adequacy of reasons

63-66

Enforcement notices and appeals against them

67-70

The GDPR

71-82

Recitals to the GDPR

83-88

Proportionality

89-90

The EDPB: decisions and guidelines

91-94

Summary of relevant aspects of the transparency principle in the GDPR

95-96

The parties’ overarching submissions

97-103

Ground 1:

The Information Commissioner’s submissions

104-108

Experian’s submissions

109-114

Alleged overarching errors: discussion and conclusions

115-131

Alleged specific errors: discussion and conclusions

132-142

Concluding observations on Ground 1

143

Ground 2:

The Information Commissioner’s submissions

144-149

Experian’s submissions

150-155

Alleged overarching error: discussion and conclusions

156-160

Alleged specific errors: discussion and conclusions

161-179

Concluding observations on Ground 2

180-181

Ground 3:

The Information Commissioner’s submissions

182

Experian’s submissions

183

Discussion and conclusions

184-188

Ground 4

189

Ground 5:

The Information Commissioner’s submissions

190-191

Experian’s submissions

192

Discussion and conclusions

193-196

Outcome

197-198

6.

We start our decision by dealing with some matters of terminology.