Heading

IN THE UPPER TRIBUNAL ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS CHAMBER | Appeal No. UA-2022-001068-V [2024] UKUT 440 (AAC) |
On appeal from a decision of the Disclosure and Barring Service
Between:
JC
Appellant
- v –
The Disclosure and Barring Service
Respondent
Before: HHJ Simon Oliver sitting as a judge of the Upper Tribunal
Upper Tribunal Member Ms Rachael Smith
Upper Tribunal Member Mr Matthew Turner
Representation:
Appellant: In person
Respondent: Mr Ashley Serr of counsel
ANONYMITY ORDER On 4 November 2022, the Upper Tribunal made the following order, which remains in force: “Pursuant to rule 14 of the above Rules, anonymity is granted to the person referred to variously in these proceedings and in the documentation provided as NR, [N] and NAR. Further, and again pursuant to rule 14, anonymity is granted to the applicant in these proceedings and to the individuals referred to as PM, CLF, KLJ, DT, HB, JM, MM, DH, RW, [GR], [AE], CX, BM, [AS], LS, HS, [CE], [S], and [C]. Accordingly, the disclosure of any matter which is likely to lead members of the public to identify any of them is prohibited. Failure to comply may lead to Contempt of Court proceedings.”. Where there are initials in square brackets in that order, the names were given in the order. But those are not reproduced here since this decision will be published. |
DECISION
The decision of the Upper Tribunal is to dismiss this appeal.
REASONS FOR DECISION
- Heading
- A summary of the Upper Tribunal’s decision
- Introductory matters
- The rule 14 Order on this appeal
- A very brief summary of the background to this appeal
- Permission to Appeal
- The evidence and the late evidence
- The statutory framework
- The basis for a “relevant conduct” barring decision
- Rights of appeal
- The Case Law
- The DBS referrals, the investigation and the decision to bar
- The ABE interview
- The Appellant’s oral evidence
- Submissions
- Conclusions on grounds of appeal
- Conclusions
![[2024] UKUT 440 (AAC)](https://backend.juristeca.com/files/emisores/logo_3a2BKne.png)