the test is not one of the civil standard of proof, which is designed to produce one outcome; the language of the statute is consistent with a number of realistic outcomes co-existing: Patel at [8], C
the test is not one of the civil standard of proof, which is designed to produce one outcome; the language of the statute is consistent with a number of realistic outcomes co-existing: Patel at [8], Carsberg at [13], Roffe at [35-36], R(TV Harrison) at [41]
referring to a test of “not fanciful” rather than what is realistic is not an error of law: Banner Homes (CA) at [34], (UT) at [37-38], Worthy Developments at [20]
“realistic” means having to show a sensible and practical idea of what can be achieved or expected and representing things in a way which is accurate or true to life: Carsberg at [15]
- Heading
- Section 1
- The First-tier Tribunal Decision
- Permission to Appeal
- The Statutory Framework
- The Grounds of Appeal
- The Council’s Submissions
- The Appellant’s Reply
- Analysis
- Section 9
- Section 10
- the test is not one of the civil standard of proof, which is designed to produce one outcome; the language of the statute is consistent with a number of realistic outcomes co-existing: Patel at [8], C
- it is important not to concentrate on the hard-headed commercial or financial analysis and a detailed business case is not required, but it is necessary to show a sensible and practical idea of what c
- the test is a low one, but there must be at least some indication that the aspirations are realistic: Carsberg at [20]
- The Decision under Appeal
- Conclusion Conclusions
![[2025] UKUT 051 (AAC)](https://backend.juristeca.com/files/emisores/logo_3a2BKne.png)