Factual background
Factual background
Appellant’s offending history
DBS’ barring decision relied on the Appellant having been found to have committed certain criminal offences:
27 May 2000 - police caution (which means the Appellant admitted the offence) for committing the offence of disorderly behaviour or using threatening, abusive or insulting words likely to cause harassment, alarm or distress;
- Heading
- Upper Tribunal Judge Mitchell
- Judicial summary
- Factual background
- 24 October 2003 – police caution for committing the offence of common assault
- DBS’ decision making
- DBS’ decision
- in relation to the Appellant’s 2004 conviction for causing grievous bodily harm
- in relation to the Appellant’s 2003 caution for common assault
- What the Appellant did next
- Legal framework
- Grounds of appeal
- Ground 1
- Ground 2
- Arguments
- Appellant’s cross-examination at the hearing
- DBS
- Panel’s questioning of the Appellant
- Analysis
- Ground 1
- Disposal
- Conclusions
![[2025] UKUT 329 (AAC)](https://backend.juristeca.com/files/emisores/logo_3a2BKne.png)