Judicial summary
Judicial summary
DBS gave inadequate reasons for deciding that it was appropriate to include the Appellant on the children’s barred list where the only evidence before DBS concerned the Appellant’s two police cautions, and one conviction, for offences of threatening behaviour or violence committed between 2000 and 2004.
Please note the Summary of Decision is included for the convenience of readers. It does not form part of the decision. The Decision and Reasons of the Upper Tribunal panel follow.
DECISION
The decision of the Upper Tribunal is to allow the appeal because Disclosure and Barring Service made a mistake of law. Under section 4(6)(b) of the Safeguarding Vulnerable Groups Act 2006, the Upper Tribunal remits this matter to DBS for a new decision. By virtue of section 4(7)(b) of the 2006 Act, the Appellant is removed from the children’s barred list until the DBS make a new decision.
REASONS FOR DECISION
Introduction
In these reasons:
“2006 Act” means the Safeguarding Vulnerable Groups Act 2006;
“DBS” means Disclosure and Barring Service.
- Heading
- Upper Tribunal Judge Mitchell
- Judicial summary
- Factual background
- 24 October 2003 – police caution for committing the offence of common assault
- DBS’ decision making
- DBS’ decision
- in relation to the Appellant’s 2004 conviction for causing grievous bodily harm
- in relation to the Appellant’s 2003 caution for common assault
- What the Appellant did next
- Legal framework
- Grounds of appeal
- Ground 1
- Ground 2
- Arguments
- Appellant’s cross-examination at the hearing
- DBS
- Panel’s questioning of the Appellant
- Analysis
- Ground 1
- Disposal
- Conclusions
![[2025] UKUT 329 (AAC)](https://backend.juristeca.com/files/emisores/logo_3a2BKne.png)