![[2025] UKUT 329 (AAC)](https://backend.juristeca.com/files/emisores/logo_3a2BKne.png){kind=logo}
Ground 1
Ground 1
It is not necessary for us to determine Ground 1, and we do not attempt to do so. That is not to be read as any expression of opinion about the merits, or demerits, of Ground 1. A new DBS decision is required in this case in which this and other aspects of the Appellant’s case may be considered afresh by DBS.
- Heading
- Upper Tribunal Judge Mitchell
- Judicial summary
- Factual background
- 24 October 2003 – police caution for committing the offence of common assault
- DBS’ decision making
- DBS’ decision
- in relation to the Appellant’s 2004 conviction for causing grievous bodily harm
- in relation to the Appellant’s 2003 caution for common assault
- What the Appellant did next
- Legal framework
- Grounds of appeal
- Ground 1
- Ground 2
- Arguments
- Appellant’s cross-examination at the hearing
- DBS
- Panel’s questioning of the Appellant
- Analysis
- Ground 1
- Disposal
- Conclusions