[2025] UKUT 98 (AAC)

Section 4 of the 2006 Act sets out the circumstances in which an individual may appeal against the inclusion of their name in the barred lists or either of them. An appeal may be made only on grounds that the DBS has made a mistake on any point of law or in any finding of fact which it has made and on which the barring decision was made (see section 4(1) and (2) of the 2006 Act).

An appeal under section 4 of the 2006 Act may only be made with the permission of the Upper Tribunal (see section 4(4) of the 2006 Act).

Unless the Upper Tribunal finds that the DBS has made a mistake of law or fact it must confirm the decision of the DBS (see section 4(5) of the 2006 Act). If the Upper Tribunal finds that the DBS has made such a mistake it must either direct the DBS to remove the person from the list or remit the matter to DBS for a new decision.

If the Upper Tribunal remits a matter to DBS under section 4(6)(b) the Upper Tribunal may set out any findings of fact which it has made (and on which the DBS must base its new decision) and the person must be removed from the list until the DBS makes its new decision, unless the Upper Tribunal directs otherwise.

Section 4(3) of the 2006 Act provides that, for the purposes of section 4(2) of the 2006 Act, whether or not it is ‘appropriate’ for an individual to be included in a barred list is “not a question of law or fact”.