v Secretary of State for the Home Department
[2012] UKSC 54.3.The effect of the decision of the Supreme Court was to require a fresh hearing of the Appellant’s appeal by the First-tier Tribunal (the “FtT”). The period thereafter was punctuated by case management review hearings, much inter-partes correspondence, debates about disclosure, exchanges regarding a proposed further interview of the Appellant by the Secretary of State’s agents and, ultimately, a fresh decision by the Secretary of State dated 10 January 2014. This represents the current, active decision which culminated in the decision of the FtT now under appeal.
- INTRODUCTION
- Sirri
- v Secretary of State for the Home Department
- THE REFUGEE CONVENTION
- THE SECRETARY OF STATE’S DECISIONS
- if proven
- DECISION OF THE
- “55 Refugee Convention: certification
- PERMISSION TO APPEAL
- there
- v Secretary of State for the Home Department and UNHCR (Intervening)
- the Appellant began to offer detailed explanations
- FIRST GROUND OF APPEAL: SECTION 8 AND ADVERSE INFERENCES
- “8 Claimant's credibility
- weight
- JT (Cameroon)
- both
- opinion
- text
- drafts
- reproductions
- Secretary of State for the Home Department
- Wednesbury
- CONCLUSION
- Chronology
- Appeal ref: AA/10668/2006
- IMMIGRATION & ASYLUM CHAMBER
- Between
- SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE HOME DEPARTMENT
- Respondent
- Egypt
- Jordan / Yemen
- United Kingdom
- Asylum appeal proceedings