Case No. UKUT-00448-(IAC)

20.09.06 A gives notice of appeal under s.83 Nationality Immigration and Asylum Act 2002. 05.12.06 R maintains decision to refuse asylum and serves fresh reasons for refusal letter & a Respondent’s Bundle. 01.05.07 Appeal heard by the AIT. & 19.06.07 20.07.07 Date of AIT determination, dismissing A’s appeal against exclusion from refugee status. 03.09.07 Application to the AIT for permission to appeal to the Court of Appeal.03.10.07 Application [above] refused. 04.06.08 Permission to appeal granted by the Court of Appeal before May LJ and Moses LJ. 27.11.08 Appeal heard by the Court of Appeal.18.03.09 Judgment of the Court of Appeal, allowing the appeal to the extent of remittal to the AIT for reconsideration on the proper basis.15.05.09 Petition to the Supreme Court.14-17.05.12 Appeal heard in the Supreme Court (with joined case of DD (Afghanistan). (UNHCR intervening).21.11.12 Supreme Court judgment. Dismisses appeal against the order for remittal but accepts A’s legal arguments concerning, in particular, the standard of proof to be applied in exclusion cases.14.05.13 FtT CMR and Directions.25.06.13 R fails to comply with above direction.08.07.13 TSols notify BPP of intention to interview A and that consideration was being given to exclusion under Articles 1F(a) and (b), in addition to (c). 23.07.13 BPP ask to be informed of proposed subject matter of interview and for sight of the documents on which it would be based.06.08.13 TSols propose to BPP that by 16th August they will serve ‘a copy of any material on which the SSHD proposes to either put questions to the Appellant in interview or to rely upon in any decision’. 07.08.13 BPP agree to timescale for disclosure but request that R should also supply any CPS material reviewed by her but not relied on. BPP advise A’s instructions will be taken in relation to proposed interview but week of 16th September (proposed by TSols) would be unsuitable as solicitor with conduct would be on leave. This was followed by further disclosure.12.09.13 TSols advise interview is to take place in Liverpool over the course of three days (the previous proposal had been for a one day interview in Croydon). 23.09.13 TSols advise that proposed interview would cover all relevant aspects of A’s life since the 1980s and would be based around the disclosure provided in August. BPP asked to confirm within 14 days whether A would attend.30.09.13 Further CMR.10.01.14 R’s further reasons for refusal letter. 27.01.14 Further CMR.31.01.14 Grant of Restricted Leave to A and imposition of restricted leave conditions.25.02.14 Letter before claim challenging restricted leave conditions.07.04.14. Further CMR.09.04.14 FtT decision on witness summons issue.25.04.14 Judicial Review claim issued re decision to grant Restricted Leave (JR/5697/2014)28.05.14 & FtT hearing.17.03.15 A’s appeal against exclusion allowed by the FtT.13.04.15 CMRH: Counsel for SSHD confirms SSHD accepts that A would be at risk on return to Egypt.16.04.15 Promulgation of final FTT determination: A’s appeal against refusal of refugee status allowed.20.04.15 R applies for permission to appeal.01.05.15 R’s application refused.15.05.15 R renews application to Upper Tribunal.16.10.15 Upper Tribunal grants permission to appeal to R.04 & 25 July 2016 Upper Tribunal hearing.28 July 2016 Upper Tribunal’s judgment.17 August 2016 Unembargoed judgment disseminated.