THE REFUGEE CONVENTION
4.By Article 1A(2) of the Refugee Convention, a person qualifies for refugee status if – “ …. owing to well founded fear of being persecuted for reasons of race, religion, nationality, membership of a particular social group or political opinion, [he] is outside the country of his nationality and is unable or, owing to such fear, is unwilling to avail himself of the protection of that country …. ” Article 1F provides: “ The provisions of this Convention shall not apply to any person with respect to whom there are serious reasons for considering that: (a)
He has committed a crime against peace, a war crime, or a crime against humanity, as defined in the international instruments drawn up to make provision in respect of such crimes. (b)
He has committed a serious non-political crime outside the country of refuge prior to his admission to that country as a refugee.
(c)
He has been guilty of acts contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations. ” The operative provision in this case is Article 1F(c).
- INTRODUCTION
- Sirri
- v Secretary of State for the Home Department
- THE REFUGEE CONVENTION
- THE SECRETARY OF STATE’S DECISIONS
- if proven
- DECISION OF THE
- “55 Refugee Convention: certification
- PERMISSION TO APPEAL
- there
- v Secretary of State for the Home Department and UNHCR (Intervening)
- the Appellant began to offer detailed explanations
- FIRST GROUND OF APPEAL: SECTION 8 AND ADVERSE INFERENCES
- “8 Claimant's credibility
- weight
- JT (Cameroon)
- both
- opinion
- text
- drafts
- reproductions
- Secretary of State for the Home Department
- Wednesbury
- CONCLUSION
- Chronology
- Appeal ref: AA/10668/2006
- IMMIGRATION & ASYLUM CHAMBER
- Between
- SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE HOME DEPARTMENT
- Respondent
- Egypt
- Jordan / Yemen
- United Kingdom
- Asylum appeal proceedings
