BW (Witness Statements by Advocates) Afghanistan
[2014] UKUT 00568 (IAC) the roles of advocate and witness are distinct and, thus, in cases where a first instance advocate becomes a witness a different representative must be instructed.”
Having established the material facts, the reviewing or appellate court or tribunal must not overlook that there is an onus of proof in play: the onus rests on the appellant to prove, on the balance of probabilities, that the first instance judicial decision is infected by apparent bias. 15. In
- Permission to Appeal
- Framework of this Appeal
- The Apparent Bias Ground
- BW (Witness statements by advocates)
- Singh v SSHD
- Wagner (advocate’s conduct – fair hearing)
- Alubankudi
- demeanour
- BW (Witness Statements by Advocates) Afghanistan
- Alubankudi (appearance of bias)
- AAN (Veil) Afghanistan
- MM (Unfairness; E&R) Sudan
- Porter v Magill
- Re Medicaments
- Lawal v Northern Spirit
- AM (Fair Hearing) Sudan
- Singh
- as a whole
- a real possibility
- duty
- could
- prima facie
- Decision and Order
